American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 2017, 5(4), 126-135
DOI: 10.12691/AJEEE-5-4-2
Original Research

A Low-Cost Educational Remotely Controlled Solar Energy Laboratory

Salaheddin Odeh1, , Tarek Rishmawi1 and Rafat Al-Hawash1

1Faculty of Engineering, Al-Quds University, Abu Dies, Jerusalem, Palestine

Pub. Date: July 10, 2017

Cite this paper

Salaheddin Odeh, Tarek Rishmawi and Rafat Al-Hawash. A Low-Cost Educational Remotely Controlled Solar Energy Laboratory. American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 2017; 5(4):126-135. doi: 10.12691/AJEEE-5-4-2

Abstract

This paper proposes the hardware and software implementation of the system required to establish a low-cost educational remotely controlled solar energy laboratory. The system consists of two main parts, a Solar Energy System and a Remotely Controlled Laboratory. The Solar Energy System is a Photovoltaic system, which consists of multiple photovoltaic cells that convert solar radiation (sunlight) or normal lights into usable direct current (DC) electricity, and then it either charges a backup battery or uses an inverter circuit that changes direct current (DC) to alternating current (AC). The other part of the system is a Remotely Controlled Laboratory, aimed at enabling students to control solar energy experiments remotely.

Keywords

remote labs, instrumentation, photovoltaic system, solar energy

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  ABET: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. [Online]. Available at: http://www.abet.org/about-abet/.
 
[2]  S. Dormido, H.Vargas, J. Sánchez, N. Duro, R. Dormido, S. Dormido-Canto, and F. Esquembre, “Using Web-Based Laboratories for Control Engineering Education,” International Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal, September, 2007.
 
[3]  Z. Nedic, J. Machotka, and A. Nafalski, “Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories,” Proc. 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, Colorado, USA, November, 2003.
 
[4]  W. G. Hutzel, A remotely accessed HVAC laboratory for distance education. Int. J. Eng. Education18, 6, pp. 711-716, 2002.
 
[5]  S. Odeh, “Building reusable remote labs with adaptable client user-interfaces,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 999-1015, 2010.
 
[6]  D. Assante, M. Tronconi, “Photovoltaic System as a Remote Didactic Laboratory for Electrical Engineering Courses”, International Journal of Online Engineering, vol. 11 (4), 2015.
 
[7]  R. S. Herrera, M. A. Márquez, A. Mejías, R. Tirado, J. M. Andújar, “Exploring the usability of a remote laboratory for photovoltaic systems”, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48(29), pp. 7-12, 2015.
 
[8]  J. Ma, and J. Nickerson, “Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review,” ACM Computer Survey , Vol.38, Issue 3, Article No.7, 2006.
 
[9]  Z. Nedic, J. Machotka, A. Nafalski, “Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories,” in: Proc. of the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. T3E-1-6. Boulder, Colorado, USA, November (2003).
 
[10]  E. Valentin, A. Verbraeck, and H. Sol: Advantages and Disadvantages of Building Blocks in Simulation Studies: Laboratory Experiment with Simulation Experts, Simulation in Industry 15th European Simulation Symposium, SCS-European Publishing House, 2003.
 
[11]  B.Guimaraes, A. Souza, H. Gosmann, and A. Bauchspiess: “Internet Based Remote Laboratory: The Level Control of three coupled water Reservoirs”, ACCA, Santiago de Chile, 2002.
 
[12]  Odeh, S. (2010) “Building reusable remote labs with adaptable client user-interfaces, “Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 999-1015.
 
[13]  Sommerville I. Software Engineering. Addison Wesley, 2016, pp.415-438.
 
[14]  LINX: Available at: https://labviewhacker.com.
 
[15]  VISA: Available at http://www.ni.com/visa/.
 
[16]  JKI VI Package Manager: Available at http://jki.net/vipm.
 
[17]  U. Reja, K. L. Manfreda, V. Hlebec, and V. Vehovar1: “Open-ended vs. Close-ended Questions in Web Questionnaires”, Advances in Methodology and Statistics (Metodološki zvezki), 19, pp.159-177, 2003.
 
[18]  Abu Shanab, S., Odeh, S., Hodrob, R., Anabtawi, M. (2012). Augmented Reality Internet Labs Versus Hands-On and Virtual Labs: A Comparative Study. In: The 2012 International Conference on Interactive Mobile and Computer Aided Learning (IMCL), 6-8 November, Amman, Jordan, pp. 17-21.